That might make sense to vote on someone for a suspicion poll . . . if you're new, maybe. But if that was the only reason she had to vote on her in the ousting then that's definitely pretty fucking shady.
She was doing that, and it did look weird at the time . . . I was sure it had to be her and she was trying to look less suspicious by not really trying to get people to vote the other person up with her. Simca could've been just going along with that to try and look less suspicious herself, though . . .
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:35 pm (UTC)Fuck, what were her reasons for that? Something about what someone else said, right?
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:38 pm (UTC)That's what she said in the ousting poll.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 11:12 pm (UTC)